General information
Graduate Programs
Undergraduate programs
Course Pages
Faculty research
Outreach
Facilities
 
 
 
 

B. Tracy Nixon

Associate Professor of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
154 North Frear Laboratory, University Park, PA 16802
Phone: (814) 865-3679
Fax: (814) 863-7024
Email: btn1@psu.edu

B.S. in education, University of Missouri, Columbia
M.S. in genetics, University of Missouri, Columbia
Ph.D. in Cell Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Boston
Post Doctoral in Physiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston
Post Doctoral in Molecular Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston

Nixon Lab Web Site

Signal Transduction in Procaryotes: Structure / Function in Rhizobium DctD, enteric NtrC, and NtrC1 of Aquifex aeolicus

Focus

  • molecular mechanisms of two component sensory transduction to the transcriptional apparatus in prokaryotes.
    • We examine the structural and functional basis of two component signal transduction in the C4-dicarboxylate transport system of Sinorhizobium meliloti and Rhizobium leguminosarum that fix nitrogen in a symbiotic relationship with the agriculturally important legumes alfalfa and peas. Because dicarboxylic acids are used as energy sources to fuel such nitrogen fixation, the research may lead to improved strains of rhizobium. More importantly, the dct system serves as an example of two-component signal transduction, which is the predominant form of signal transduction in bacteria and also found in archaebacteria, fungi and plants. Despite its obvious importance, the structural basis for this form of signal transduction is only now being elucidated.
    • For comparison, we are also investigating signal transduction in the nitrogen regulation system of Salmonella typhimurium and the NtrC1 protein of Aquifex aeolicus. The function of the NtrC1 protein is unknown, but coming from an extreme thermophile it behaves well in crystallography experiments. This latter work is being conducted in collaboration with Dr. Sydney Kustu and Dr. David Wemmer, both of UC Berkeley.

 

  Working hypothesis

  1. sensor protein detects ligand
    • direct binding, or via transport protein in membrane
  2. activated sensor phosphorylates transcriptional regulator
    • sensor autophosphorylates on Histidine
    • phosphate transferred to Aspartate on activator protein
    • how phosphorylation activates the activator is not known
  3. activated regulator binds upstream of the promoter it regulates
    • binding is to two, tandem sites
    • binding is cooperative
    • the mechanism of cooperative binding is not known
  4. DNA-bound activator assembles into an octameric or higher order structure
    • the stoichiometry and mechanism for assembly is not known
  5. the activator makes contact with RNA polymerase
    • via a DNA looping mechanism that sometimes involves an additional DNA scaffolding protein
  6. the activator binds and hydrolyses ATP, stimulating transcription
    • the polymerase/promoter complex changes from a closed form in which DNA is double stranded to an open one containing the single stranded bubble needed for transcription to initiate
    • the mechanism of linking ATP-hydrolysis to promoter isomerization is unknown

 

 Objectives

  • characterize the DNA binding properties of DctD in inactive and active forms
    • determine the intrinsic binding energy for activator / DNA interactions
    • characterize cooperativity in DNA binding by the activator, which has been found to increase upon activation
    • characterizing the biochemical basis for the basal and increased cooperativity

      Figure: DNAse 1 footprints for wild type and 5-bp insertion templates reveals cooperativity in DctD binding to the the dctA UAS. Apparently equal affinities for the wild type DNA splits into two differing affinities when the sites are spaced 1/2 turn of the DNA helix apart.

  • clarifying the precise role of ATP hydrolysis in the activation process
    • use Mant-ADP and Mant-ATP  in stop-flow experiments to characterize nucleotide binding properties
    • use a variety of techniques to detect conformational and oligomeric changes that are induced by nucleotide binding, hydrolysis or release
      • protease sensitivity assays
      • analytical ultracentrifugation
      • biacore
      • spectroscopic assays and spectrally enhanced forms of DctD

     

  • characterizing the physical basis for signal transduction from the N-terminal domain to the rest of the activator protein
    • identification of point mutations that de-regulate the transcriptional activator
      • these mutant proteins activate transcription in the absence of signal transduction
      • they map onto a surface of the N-terminal domain of the activator protein (see figure below)
    • determine the structure of the two-component receiver domain and others of DctD or NtrC
      • 1.7 A to 2.9 A X-ray structures have been solved for DctD fragment 2-143 of wild type sequence or bearing substitutions D55C, E121K, K122E, and S54C (see figure below). Contact the lab for details and information about on-going X-ray or NMR experiments.

    • Figure: DctD sequence was modeled onto the structure of CheY, and then using MolMol a surface contour was drawn and painted white. The charge potential was then calculated for residues Y100, D101, E121 and K122 and used to color that part of the surface contour; substitutions of these 4 residues have been found to yield constitutive phenotypes.

      The structure of DctD residues 2-143, including the receiver domain and adjacent linker that joins it to the central ATPase domain was obtained by X-ray crystallography. The structure reveals a novel dimerization motif for response regulator domains, and the genetic data above indicates that the dimeric state acts to inhibit the ATPase, setting the stage for regulation by phosphorylation. Phosphorylation affects the dimeric state directly by switching between this and a second alternative dimeric state. In the off state, the ATPase domain oligomerization surface is sequestered; phosphorylation stabilizes a second receiver domain dimeric structure that freely permits the ATPase interfaces to find each other (based on NtrC1 structures being prepared for publication by Soek-Yong et al.). OFF State: a) stereo view of the dimer, interface in bold; b) typical in vivo assays for constitutive amino acid substitutions; c) stereo view showing the location of 17 such substitutions (bold).

      As alluded to above, solving a crystal structure of BeF-bound receiver domain of DctD culminated in a model for activation in DctD and NtrC1 proteins that starkly contrasts with activation in enteric NtrC. The work shows two distinct mechanisms exist for integrating a common two component signal transduction trigger with different domain-domain interactions to converge on regulated assembly of the AAA+ ATPase domains present in these proteins. The summary figure shown below was used for the cover of the December 2002 issue of FASEB J.

      Crystal structure of the combined receiver and ATPase domains of NtrC1, and of the ATPase domain alone, have been solved by X-ray crystallography. Functional assays have been performed for truncated forms of the protein, and for selected amino acid substitutions. Results show that NtrC1 functions like DctD, not NtrC, and provide a model for explaining how the receiver domain alternately represses and derepresses the assembly of the AAA+ ATPase. The off-state dimer of the receiver domain and linker stabilize an inactive dimer of the ATPase. Phosphorylation of the receiver domain stabilizes it in an alternative dimer conformation that repositions the linkers and receiver domains to prevent the contacts needed to maintain the repressed ATPase dimer. This permits the ATPase domain to move from a front-to-front orientation to a back-to-front orientation, which directs self assembly of a heptamer ring. This work will be published in October in Genes & Dev. The figure shown below is to be the journal cover

  Collaborators

  • Dr. Tim Hoover (Microbiology, University of Georgia)
    • examining the physical basis for interaction between the activator and the RNA polymerase
    • isolating cooperativity mutations in DctD
       
  • Dr. Dale Kaiser (Department of Microbiology, Stanford)
    • examining the role of similar activator proteins in controlling the starvation response of Myxococcus xanthus
  • Dr. Karen Miller (Department of Food Science, Penn State)
    • investigating the role of cyclic-a-glucans in the nodulation process that leads to effective symbiosis between rhizobium species and legumes.
  • Drs. Sydney Kustu (Plant and Microbial Biology, UC Berkeley), David Wemmer (Chemistry and LBL, UC Berkeley), A. Daniel Jones (Chemistry, Penn State), and Juliette T. Lecomte and Christopher Falzone (Chemistry, Penn State).
    • Structural studies of DctD, NtrC1, and NtrC
  • Dr. Martin Buck and David Studholme (Imperial College, London).
    • Genome analysis of sigma-54 dependent promoters.

 

Representative Publications:

 
  1. HTML - How easy it is! 
  2. Finding those interesting WWW sites... 
  3. Forms & Scripts 
  4. Learning About RasMol 
  5. Learning About KineMage 
  6. Sequence Alignments 
  7. Phylogenetic Trees 
  8. 3D Protein Models by E-mail 
  9. 3D Protein Models by InsightII 
  10. Quantitative Analysis of Data 
  • R. Ilene Kaufman and B. Tracy Nixon. 1996. Use of PCR to isolate genes encoding s54-dependent activators from diverse bacteria. J. Bacteriology 178:3967-3990. 
  • Dean Scholl and B. Tracy Nixon. 1996. Cooperative Binding of DctD to the dctA UAS of Rhizobium meliloti is Enhanced in a Constitutively Active Truncated Mutant. J. Biol. Chem. 271:26435-26442.  (pdf)
  • Staley, M., Zeringue, L.C., Kidd, R.D., Farber, G.K., Nixon, B.T. 1998. Crystallization and characterization of the Rhizobium meliloti DctD two-component receiver domain. Acta Crystallographica, D 54(2 ( Pt 6)):1416-8. 
  • B. Tracy Nixon. 1998. MDL Chime Structural Aids for BMMB 514 - Molecular Biology and Cellular Regulation (course discontinued in 2000, but CHIME pages are still available). 
    (a movable-, scaleable-window that can be left open until you are familiar with the instructions).

  • Two-Component Signal Transduction
    DNA Double Helix Structure
    Lambda Repressor cI / DNA Interactions
    Eukaryotic Transcription Factor TFIIIA - A Zinc Finger Protein
    Leucine Zipper bzip DNA Complex
    TBP
    The a Subunit of E. coli RNA Polymerase
    Sigma factors and promoters 
    Polymerase III b Subunit - DNA Clamp

  • B. Tracy Nixon. 1998. Tutorial on Making HTML-Chime Pages 
  • John Sojda, III, Baohua Gu, Joon Lee, Timothy R. Hoover, B. Tracy Nixon. 1999. A rhizobial homolog of IHF stimulates transcription of dctA in Rhizobium leguminosarum but not in Sinorhizobium meliloti. Gene 238:489-500. 
  • David J. Studholme, Martin Buck and B. Tracy Nixon. 2000. Identification of potential sN-dependent promoters in bacterial genomes. Microbiol. 146:3021-3023. (pdf
  • B. Tracy Nixon. 2000. A structural sub-family of two-component receiver domains sharing a coiled-coil dimer motif as seen in DctD. 
  • Matthew Meyer, Sungdae Park, Lori Zeringue, Mark Staley, Mike McKinstry, R. Ilene Kaufman, Hong Zhang, Dalai Yan, Neela Yennawar, Hemant Yennawar, Greg Farber, and B. Tracy Nixon. 2001. A dimeric two-component receiver domain inhibits the s54-dependent ATPase in DctD. FASEB J.. The FASEB Journal Express Article 10.1096/fj.00-0516fje. Published online March 20, 2001, (pdf at FASEB J
  • B. Tracy Nixon. 2001. A 1 credit course in crystallography methods.
  • Sungdae Park, Hong Zhang, A. Daniel Jones, and B. Tracy Nixon. 2002. Biochemical evidence for multiple dimeric states of the Sinorhizobium meliloti DctD receiver domain. Biochemistry 41:10934-10941.
  • Sungdae Park, Matthew Meyer, A. Daniel Jones, Hemant P. Yennawar, Neela H. Yennawar, and B. Tracy Nixon. 2002. Two-component signaling in the AAA+ ATPase DctD: binding Mg2+ and BeF3- selects between alternative dimeric states of the receiver domain. The FASEB Journal Express Article 10.1096/fj.02-0395fje, October 4, 2002.  (pdf at FASEB J)
  • Ying-Kai Wang, Sungdae Park, B. Tracy Nixon, and Timothy R. Hoover. 2003. Nucleotide-induced structural changes in the sigma54-dependent activator DctD. J. Bacteriol. 189: 6215-6219.
  • Seok-Yong Lee, Armando de la Torre, Dalai Yan, Sydney Kustu, B. Tracy Nixon, and David Wemmer. 2003. Regulation of the transcriptional activator NtrC1: structural studies of the regulatory and AAA+ ATPase domains. Genes and Dev. 17:2552-2563. Cover image local jpeg file. or publisher's site.
  • Hao Xu, Baohua Gu, B. Tracy Nixon, and Timothy R. Hoover. 2004. Purification and characterization of the AAA+ domain of Sinorhizobium meliloti DctD, a s54-dependent transcriptional activator. J. Bacteriol. 186: 3499-3507.
  • Hao Xu, Mary T. Kelly, B. Tracy Nixon, and Timothy R. Hoover. 2004. Novel substitutions in the s54-dependent transcriptional activator DctD that uncouple ATP hydrolysis from transcriptional activation. Mol. Microbiol. 54: 32-44. pdf This is an electronic version of an article published in Molecular Microbiology. Complete citation information for the final version of the paper, as published in the print edition of Molecular Microbiology, is available on the Blackwell Synergy online delivery service, accessible via the journal's website at www.mol-micro.com or www.blackwell-synergy.com.
  • Search the MEDLINE database at PubMed for articles by B.T. Nixon


    general | graduate programs | undergrad programs | course pages | faculty research | outreach | facilities & equipment

    This page is maintained by Linda Kunes: ljk4@psu.edu (814-865-2538)
    Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, 108 Althouse Lab, University Park, PA 16802

    This page was last updated on August 27, 2002

    If you would like to communicate with the keepers of the BMB Web server, please send electronic mail to: support@www.bmb.psu.edu