PHYSIOLOGY:
THE BIOLOGICAL STUDY OF THE FUNCTIONS OF LIVING ORGANISMS AND
THEIR PARTS.
RELATIONSHIP OF STRUCTURE TO FUNCTION
However, difficult for brain to function to without the heart
or correspondingly, difficult for genome to function without ribosomes.
Studying the parts doesn't tell the complete story.
Physiology can be regarded as the study of the life processes
of an organism, mediated by its structures operating together,
to accomplish the requirements of life for that organism.
Bacteria must accomplish in a few cubic micrometers all of the
same processes that we perform in the context of life: nutrient
acquisition and waste secretion; energy production; biosynthesis;
replication; cell division; repair processes; sensing of and adaptation
to environment.
Bacteria are very successful at growth and survival, yet they
exhibit greater physiological and metabolic diversity than larger
life forms (animals, plants, etc.). Microbial physiology can allow
detailed studies of processes that can not be studied in larger
life forms.
A fundamental difference between microbial physiology and plant or animal physiology:
the organism IS a cell, whereas large life forms are collections
of cells
Consider the difference between an average bacterium (measured
in mm) and an elephant (measured in
meters).
V = 4/3 p r3 Volume of sphere/ coccus
V= p
r2 h Volume of cylinder/ bacillus
smallest bacteria (e.g., mycoplasmas) 0.2 mm in diameter---V = 4.18 x 10-15 cm3
largest bacterium known (60 mm x 600 mm---V = 1.74 x 10-6 cm3
The ratio of these two numbers is 4.2 x 108 !!!
Eucaryotes span an even larger range of about 1018!!
However, it is not size per se that is important from a
physiological perspective. It is surface to volume ratio
that is critical.
Surface of cylinder S = 2 p r h, hence S/V = 2/r
Surface of sphere S = 4 p
r h, hence S/V = 3/r
As r gets smaller and smaller, S/V gets larger and larger--difference
between sphere and cylinder becomes insignificant. If elephant
is approximated by a sphere of 3 m, then 3/3 = 1.0 m-1 Correspondingly,
a small mycoplasm would have S/V = 3/1 x 10-7 = 3 x 107 m-1
Physiological consequence: microorganism can take up nutrients
from, and secrete wastes into, the medium very rapidly. Microbial
enzymes often more efficient as well. Rapid metabolism translates
into rapid growth. Typical "generation times" for bacteria
are 20 minutes to 3 hours. Elephants do not communicate with their
environment at a biochemical level as rapidly--they have to find
and eat food; they have elaborate respiratory systems, digestive
systems, etc. Consequence: the generation time for an elephant
is about 3 years.
Elephant: structures are composed of differentiated cells, all
of which share many related properties.
Microbes: made up of macromolecular aggregates
Again, size is an issue. You can easily isolate the elephants
liver and study it, even if you suffer a 99% loss during isolation.
It is not possible to isolate an individual organelle from an
individual cell for bacteria. With bacteria, one must study populations
of organisms and populations of structures isolated from that
population of organisms.
Many individual measurements can be made on a single elephant
to determine the variability of that individual, and that individual
can then be compared to other individuals. With microorganisms,
one most always measure the average response of a population or
the properties of the average organelle or molecule isolated from
the population. Cells of the microbial population generally speaking
will not be identical and will not respond identically; mutation,
natural fluctuations, etc. insure this will be the case. In microbial
physiology, we MUST study the population and make assumptions
about individuals from those responses. However, it is easy to
obtain large populations. Studying the genetics of microbe is
easy; obtaining billions of elephants for study is not a possibility
in any time frame.
Considered collectively, microorganisms exhibit unparalleled metabolic
diversity and adaptability. They survive in hostile environments
where large life forms cannot survive. Adaptability exceeds that
of eucaryotes by many orders of magnitude. Hence, although microbes
are morphologically simple, the are metabolically and physiologically
complex. In contrast, large life forms are collectively complex
in structure but physiologically simple.
Nutritional requirements of large life forms are generally speaking
more complex than those of microorganisms. Nutritional diversity
is reflected in the much more varied metabolism found in bacteria.
Microorganisms provide model systems for understanding how larger
life forms function and respond to their environment. Example:
studying photosynthesis in cyanobacteria is a good model system
for understanding how this process occurs in complex seaweed or
a tree. The continuity of life, established through evolution,
makes this so.
How did diversity arise? Organisms evolved to fill all niches
on Earth. In the last edition (4 volumes) of Bergey's Manual of
Determinative Bacteriology, about 3200 species of bacteria are
described. This is estimated to represent a maximum of about 1%
of all microbial species on Earth--i.e., the real number of bacterial
species could be as large as 300,000 to more than 1,000,000!!
4. 6 Billion Years Ago Formation of our solar system
4.0 BYA Earth cools and H20 condenses
4.0-3.5 BYA Primordial Soup develops "Chemical evolution occurs by photochemical synthesis of organic chemicals
3.5 BYA Origin of life--fossil evidence of life exists in rocks younger than this age--Stromatolites (fossilized microbial mats)
3.5-1.9 BYA Microbial diversification occurs
2.5 BYA Origin of oxygenic phototrophs (ancestors of modern of cyanobacteria
2 BYA Atmosphere becomes oxygenic (~1%); Fe deposits form
1.9-1.2 BYA Development of ozone shield; oxygen rises to ~10%
1.2 BYA Origin of Modern Eukaryotes
1.0 BYA Origin of Sexes
800 MYA Origin of Metazoans; oxygen content of atmosphere reachs ~20%
500 MYA Plants and Animals
400 MYA Animals develop on land
250 MYA Dinosaurs
190 MYA Mammals
65 MYA Dinosaurs extinct
5 MYA Humans Evolve
Chemical evolution: The primitive Earth had no oxygen, and the
atmosphere was thus reducing. CH4, CO2,
N2 NH3 were likely prerent,
in addition to some CO and H2. There was probably
lots of FeS and some HCN produced from discharge reactions of
CH4 and NH3. The primitive
Earth was probably 100°C, and early life was likely thermophilic
by necessity. Geochemical and electrical discharges (lightning)
produced simple then more complex organic molecules. Many biochemically
important molecules can be produced in this manner in the laboratory
from similar gas mixtures. These include: simple sugars, amino
acids, purines, pyrimidines, nucleotides, and fatty acids. In
the absence of bacteria, these molecules would have become quite
concentrated in some environments. Polymerization reactions took
place by dehydration reactions, possibly catalyzed by exposed
surfaces of clays, pyrite, or basaltic glasses.
Primitive organisms: 1. must have had metabolism: ability
to accumulate, convert and transform nutrients and energy; 2.
hereditary mechanism--the ability to replicate and transfer
its properties to its offsping. Both require the development of
a cellular structure. Such structures probably developed spontaneously
from lipids and possibly simple proteins that trapped polynucleotides,
polypeptides, and other small organic molecules. It now seems
likely that before DNA and proteins, much of catalytic and hereditary
features of primitive organisms was performed by RNA--hence the
term the "RNA world." A recent Science paper showed
that a simple RNA molecule can faithfully make precise copies
of itself--a prerequisite for the development of heredity as we
know it today.
Metabolism in these primitive organisms was certainly anaerobic,
but it is difficult to say what type of reactions occurred. One
likely possibility would have been a primitive respiration based
on oxidation of hydrogen with reduction of S0
to H2S. The resulting proton gradient could
have been coupled to ATP formation through a primitive ATPase.
Alternatively, organic compounds could have been fermented to
produce energy and metabolites for biosynthesis. A third possibility,
believed to be somewhat less likely as an original mechanism,
would have been photosynthesis.
Further chemical evolution and the formation of tetrapyrroles
would have led to cytochromes, thus respiratory electron transport
chains, and more importantly photosynthesis. The first phototrophs
were again anoxygenic and may have resembled purple or green photosynthetic
bacteria of today. Photoreactions would have generated ATP while
reductants would have come from H2S and other
reduced compounds in the environment. The origins of oxygenic
photosynthesis--the second photosystem--greatly accelerated evolution
of microbes. An endless supply of electrons, through water, was
now available.
We now know from comparative analyses of nucleic acid sequences
that three main lines of descent were established relatively early
in cellular evolution. Ancestral eucaryotic cells probably resembled
modern procaryotic cells and lacked mitochondria, chloroplasts,
and possibly even the membrane-bound nucleus. Modern eucaryotes
arose late in evolution through endosymbiotic events, in which
the primitive eucaryote acquired a respiratory aerobic bacterium
to give rise to mitochondria and a cyanobacterium to give rise
to the chloroplast. Development of the eucaryotic nucleus may
have developed later as the complexity of the genome increased.
The majority of Earth's evolution has been dominated by microbes:
nearly 80% of the total evolutionary time span. Until recently,
we understood some aspects of metazoan evolution because of the
fossil record, we knew little about the evolution of microorganisms.
This has changed dramatically as molecular sequence analysis methods
have developed in the past 25 years.
1. Molecule should be universally distributed across organisms
to be studied.
2. Molecular should be functionally homologous in all organism.
3. It must be possible to align the molecules without ambiguity
in order to identify regions of homology and heterogeneity clearly.
4. Sequence of molecule chosen should change at a rate commensurate
with the evolutionary distance to be measured. The more similar
two sequences, the more closely related the two organisms.
Ribosomal RNAs are ancient molecules, functionally constant, universally
distributed, and moderately well conserved over broad phylogenetic
distances.
Prokaryotic ribosomes contain 3 RNA molecules: 5S, 16S, and 23S
rRNAs. 5S has been used but is too small (~120 nt). Both 16S rRNA
(~1500 nt) and 23S (~3000 nt) rRNAs have been used; 16S is most
common, and more than 2000 different organisms have now been sequenced.
In eukaryotes, the equivalent molecule is the 18S rRNA of the
small subunit of the 80S ribosome.
Ribosomal RNAs are easily sequenced these days. Polymerase Chain
Reaction can be used to amplify even tiny amounts of RNA into
DNA sequences which can then be sequenced. It is no longer necessary
to grow a particular organism, since sequences can be obtained
from field collected material. This offers hope of identifying
the degree of diversity of microbial life on the Earth.
Other molecules, including a variety of proteins can be used to
provide additional information. Examples include RecA protein
and RNA polymerase subunits of eubacteria.
"There must be a prokaryote
somewhere: Microbiology's search for itself." Carl R. Woese,
Microbiological Reviews 58: 1-9 (1994).
"The winds of (evolutionary)
change: breathing new life into microbiology. G. J. Olsen, C.
R. Woese, and R. Overbeek. Journal of Bacteriology 176:1-6 (1994).
Most of you were taught that there are 5 kingdoms of organisms
a la Whittaker (~1930): Animals, Plants, Fungi, Protists and
Monera. Although convenient from some points of view for grouping
and classifying organisms, this view of life doesn't represent
the phylogenetic (genealogical or evolutionary) relationships
among these organisms.
Most of us also once taught that life could be conveniently divided
into two superkingdoms: eucaryotes and procaryotes,
and this difference is a central dogma of biology and microbiology.
This notion developed in the late 1950's and early 1960's.
1. Proteobacteria (Purple Bacteria). Largest, most physiologically
diverse group of bacteria. At least five subdivisions (a,
b, g, d , e). Three subdivisions have phototrophic members;
many are heterotrophs or chemolitotrophs, however. Sulfur oxidizers,
sulfur reducers, nitrate/nitrite oxidizers; etc. Very diverse,
and most highly evolved group.
2. Cyanobacteria: Heterogeneous group. Characterized by
oxygen-evolving photosynthesis, the presence of chlorophylls and
phycobiliproteins
3. Gram-positive bacteria. Divided into Low G+C and High
G+C groups. Contains one photosynthetic group (heliobacteria),
a relative of Clostridium. Low G+C group includes Bacillus,
Clostridium, heliobacteria, and lactic acid bacteria. High G+C
group includes Corynebacterium, propionic acid bacteria,
mycobacteria, Nocardia, Streptomyces, Micromonospora.
4. Chlamydia. Obligate intracellular parasites;
lack peptidoglycan, but have outer membrane; agent of some sexually
transmitted infections.
5. Planctomyces-Pirella. Budding organisms
that lack peptidoglycan, have a proteinaceous cell wall. Obligate
aerobes, prefer dilute nutrients.
6. Bacteriodes-Flavobacteria. Major line
of gram-negative bacteria. Cytophaga/Flavobacteria
is one lineage; Bacteroides a 2nd. Mixture of properties,
including obligate fermentative anaerobes (Bacteroides),
obligate aerobes (Sporocytophaga).
7. Green sulfur bacteria. All are strictly anaerobic phototrophs;
contain chlorosomes, bacteriochlorophylls, and fix carbon by reverse
TCA cycle
8. Sprirochetes. (Spirochaeta, Borrelia, Treponema).
Free-living or parasitic; many are pathogens. Unique morphology
is a valid taxonomix criterion.
9. Deinococcus-Thermus. Only two well-known genera,
one gram-positive and one gram-negative. Deinococcus is
highly radiation resistant; Thermus is a chemoorganotrophic
thermophile.
10. Green nonsulfur bacteria. Confusing properties. Affinities
to both cyanobacteria, purple bacteria and green bacteria. Appear
to have evolved and diverged very early.
11. Thermotoga-Thermosipho. Only 2 genera. Anaerobic,
fermentative, marine hyperthermophiles (55-90°C).
12. Aquifex-Hydrogenobacter. Extreme thermophiles
(85-90°C). Aquifex is an aerobic chemolithotroph that
oxidizes H2 or reduced sulfur compounds. Hydrogenobacter
oxidizes only H2.
1. Extremely halophilic Archaea. Halobacterium sp.
Unique phototrophy based on bacteriorhodopsin.
2. Thermoplasma acidophilum. Acidophilic thermophile
(55°C). Aerobic chemoheterotroph.
3. Hyperthermophiles. Some grow above 100°C; most
are strictly anaerobic and require elemental sulfur as an electron
acceptor. Can oxidize H2 or organic compounds.
Sulfolobus oxidzes sulfur aerobically. Archaeglobus
reduces sulfate and can produce methane as well.
4. Methanogens. Strictly anaerobic organisms that produce
CH4. CO2 can be reduced
with electrons from various sources (often H2)
or CH4 can be produced from methyl substrates
such as CH3OH (methanol).
Bacteria have peptidoglycan in their walls (exceptions: Planctomyces-Pirella
(proteins), chlamydia and mycoplasma--no walls in these two)
No Archaea have peptidoglycan in their walls. Some have glycoproteins;
some have sulfated polysaccharides, but most have proteinaceous
walls.
A few methanogens have a pseudopeptidoglycan, but this lacks muramic
acid (unique to peptidoglycan).
Most useful of all non-genetic markers--very distinctive.
Bacteria and Eucarya have fatty acids linked to glycerol in ESTER
linkages.
Archaea have branched chain alcohols linked to glyercol in ETHER
linkages. Both Phytanyl and Biphytanyl forms are found.
All Bacteria have a single type of RNA polymerase (a2
b b') = Core Polymerase. To this is
added a sigma subunit (s) that recognizes
specific promoters to initiate transcription.
There are several types of Archaeal RNA polymerases. These have
8-10 subunits, more similar to Eucaryotic RNA polymerase.
Initiator is Formyl-methionine in Bacteria; Methionine in Archaea
and Eucarya
Archaeal and Eucaryotic elongation factors sensitive to diptheria
toxin; not so in Bacteria
Differential sensitivity to antibiotics (see Handout)
Functional hybrids of ribosomal subunits from Sulfolobus
(Archaea) and Yeast (Eucarya) have been made. Sulfolobus 50S subunit
+ 40S subunit of Yeast = functional ribosome! No functional hybrids
of Bacterial and Eucaryotic ribosomes have been made.